"Who Goes There?" details the events of a changeling type monster found in Antarctica. It doesn't just kill other biologicals, it replaces them in a 1 to 1 fashion. If it copies a human, the creature even thinks it is human. It is the way it hides. Really scary stuff actually.
The bulk of the story deals with the men trying to figure out who is human and who is the monster. The paranoia they go through is extremely nerve-wracking. Imagine the stress of not only knowing which one of your fellow humans was a monster... but that the monster might actually be you. That's insane.
When I went into this, I actually expected the story to be kind of corny. Science fiction from the 30's tends to be a little on the goofy side. I was pleasantly surprised to not only find it to be quite gritty, but it was a whole lot like the 80's film. Or should I say the 80's movie was like the 30's book? Either way, the story was presented in a way that seemed ahead of its time.
I do have a major criticism though. This is more of a writing criticism, to be clear. It is important that, when you write a book, you have a good balance between dialog and narrative. They are suppose to help each other out so that the reader doesn't get bogged down by either over-written exposition or too much dialog. "Who Goes There?" suffers from way too much from a constant streams of dialog. It feels like one single conversation that just goes on and on right through the entire book.
This issues comes with two problems. Firstly, it becomes increasingly difficult to know who is talking and what those people are like. It also will wear the reader out. This story does feel imbalanced in its writing, and that's really too bad. It is much like the author just hammered out what the characters would say while arguing to each other and just wanted to get it all out at once. In many ways, it reads like a script, but it isn't a script. It's a proper book.
Despite this flaw, I still recommend that you read "Who Goes There?" If you can get past the heavy dialog of the story, you will find yourself reading the tale that inspired "The Thing." It's good. It's really good, and especially surprising to see something this gritty from the 30's. Oh, and real quick: I like the title "The Thing" far more than the book's title. It is called a "thing" constantly in the story. That's just my opinion though.
This blog was written on April 13, 2023.
Thank you for reading my blog! Did you enjoy it? Either way, you can comment below, or you can email me at tkwadeauthor@gmail.com. Also stop by my Amazon.com listing by clicking this link: https://www.amazon.com/T.K.-Wade/e/B07BQK9RTZ
Check out my books! Thanks!
Cool! I was eager to read this book, but have problems with tech and it was available to me on Kindle. I'll make the effort this time. Your commentary has convinced me to do so.
ReplyDeleteGood! I'll see if I can just get you a book version to make it easier on ya.
DeleteThis is a truly frightening concept. Even the creature thinks it is human, so it becomes even more difficult to determine they are not. Thus, everyone is suspect.
ReplyDeletePretty much the fun of the whole thing.
DeleteI really liked this one but I agree with your criticisms. It was like a script, the cast kept things interesting though. I'm glad it inspired a movie though, I consider "The Thing" one of the best horror movies ever made.
ReplyDeleteYeah, and I don't hate it for it, but it did make reading it a chore.
Delete