It wouldn't be right to say that Ruth was terrible. There are quite a few of her books which were quite wonderful. But, sad to say, the bulk of her collection tends to be very similar to one another. The scenario runs about like this: Once the threat or problem has been established, one or more characters goes on a journey. Along the way, they run into areas of Oz nobody has ever seen before (and will never be seen again). This area has a theme to it such as "Everyone must always be hopping." In this example, the characters aren't doing what everyone in this location is doing (such as hopping all the time.) This makes the heroes illegal, and they are either imprisoned or threatened with some sort of forced transformation to make them more like the locals. This happens over and over again until they finally get to where they wanna go and then the main plot continues from there.
The above example is sadly the way most of her stories ran, and it was a pain to read for most of the time, However, towards the middle of the 1930's her books began to change format. The randomly themed locations greatly took up less of the book, if at all. The characters personal drives became paramount, and the missions they got involved with were rather engaging. I found myself genuinely interested in what was going to happen.
Towards the very end of the 30's, she falls back into her original habits, and the stories become much more formulaic. This was a big downer for me. I wasn't sure why it happened. Perhaps, it was too much for the children of the time, or the publishers pressured her to do so. Either way, I was left feeling kind of disappointed.
Another issue I took with her was how patronizing she was to children. Baum never did that. He would go out of his way to explain everything in a very straight-forward manner. Ruth would often have silly explanations or no explanation at all. It could sometimes get frustrating.
I personally think, on the whole, Baum was simply a better writer when it came to the Oz books. Ruth did do good though. There were a number of wonderful characters that came about within her canon. My favorite shall always be Sir Hokus of Pokes who very much served as the local Don Quixote of the series. Either way, I think the originals take the prize.
I read these books so you don't have to. If you want the grand Oz experience, you only need to read the ones by Baum. The other ones are out there for those of us who obsess over these sorts of things. I have no regrets. I am ready to move on to the next great author of Oz! (Although I hear he did a terrible job.)
This blog was written on February 21, 2022.
Thank you for reading my blog! Did you enjoy it? Either way, you can comment below, or you can email me at tkwadeauthor@gmail.com. Also stop by my Amazon.com listing by clicking this link: https://www.amazon.com/T.K.-Wade/e/B07BQK9RTZ
Check out my books! Thanks!
Publishing is a business and sadly, marketing can supersede artistic vision. She may have been encouraged to keep her style formulaic. It would be assumed that children are too stupid to understand motivation or nuance. Then again, she was a child when the universe was first published. She may have remembered fondly that it was the silly things she enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteThe more I learn about this publisher, it's like it starts with humble beginnings, but then they go a little nuts as the decades role by.
DeleteUnfortunate that Thompson got stuck in a formula rut. At least she did have some hits with some endearing characters. It does seem that she was mindful to keep the spirit of the source material alive.
ReplyDeleteShe did. I have no regrets.
DeleteThe problem I have with writing a series is that it is hard to keep from repeating yourself. I prefer to write one story that spans a few volumes. Then, you are not repeating but completing what you started.
ReplyDeleteOh she repeated herself A LOT! This is one of the reason it may be hard for people to binge her books.
Delete