"A Christmas Story 2" was made after the death of Jean Shepherd, and it is absolutely an attempt at a cash grab off of a popular old film. 100%. They were trying to make an easy buck, and a lot of people hated even the thought of this movie, without even seen it. I remember when this film was showing up on the shelves with the other DVDs. I did not want to see it, and I pretty much spent all those years complaining about its very existence.
But what is the movie actually like?
Answer: not that bad. Still bad, just not that bad.
In the movie, Ralph accidently causes damage to a car at a dealership and has to make money quick to pay for it. All the while, he is obsessing over this girl who seems out of his league. There is also a side story about the parents, where the dad is being a cheapskate and pissing off the mother. Like... he won't even pay the money for a Christmas turkey, something I disagreed with. It did not fit his character in past iterations.
From here, we need to talk about pros and cons. Interestingly, the movie is actually fairly balanced when it comes to these, something I did not expect. Let's look at the negatives first, since it's what we expect from a film like this.
Cons:
-References to the first film. The whole point of the movie was to bring back the nostalgia of the original film... without you actually watching that first movie. At every opportunity, this film makes a reference to key moments from the first film, and it was mostly annoying, although there were a few that actually made me chuckle. I've always said that referential humor is extremely cheap, and this movie does it way too much.
-Overacting. The characters are severely overacted in most of the scenes. They cannot come across naturally at all. This was actually a sign of the times for 2012. I saw a lot of stuff back then like this. Every facial expression was just so over the top. Nobody acts like this.
-Synthetic music. Not the fun 80's synthesis. Just cheap, bad quality background music.
-Emphasis on slapstick humor. Why do this? Why have people fall down and crash into things so regularly? The point of Jean Shepherd's stuff was to tell stories that were relatable. Nobody relates to a flurry of slapstick moments.
Pros:
-The setting is 1946, and it is brilliantly recreated almost to a surreal extent. Everything is very clean and beautiful. Even the homeless people look like they have it good. I loved the design and look of everything in this movie.
-This is a solid Christmas movie in general. It covers the concept of generosity versus cynicism and greed very well. It does not go into Christian ideals, but nothing from Jean Shepherd ever did anyhow.
-The characters are all there and well-represented. Although the Old Man is not really on par with his predecessors, he was less insane than the previous entry. I did actually like him.
-The story is very much a Jean Shepherd-type story, although it isn't based on anything he wrote. They wrote it to fit his style, and I think they did a good job.
-In addition to the writing, let's talk about a man named Nat Mauldin. This guy was the narrator, and he was doing an out-right impression of Jean Shepherd here. He did an amazing job. Hands-down. My God. I was so impressed with his narration and also of the quality of the writing here. There was nothing wrong with it, and it may actually be the real reason I gave this film a pass. Seriously, listen to some of it. It's so good.
Guess what?! I am recommending the film! I didn't expect I was going to do that. Although this film just barely passes. It almost sits right on the line, but there is enough effort here that makes it an okay film to watch and even enjoy. Just be very clear that there are a lot of problems with this movie. It is far from perfect, but I would say I enjoyed it just a little more than "My Summer Story," mainly for just the amount of effort they put into the look and feel of the world.
All said, however, this is a hated movie. If you choose to watch it, remember that it is not a loved movie in the slightest, but I encourage an open mind. It's not that bad, and it certainly will never trump the original.
One more to go.
This blog was written on January 12, 2026.
Thank you for reading my blog! Did you enjoy it? Either way, you can comment below, or you can email me at tkwadeauthor@gmail.com. Also stop by my Amazon.com listing by clicking this link: https://www.amazon.com/T.K.-Wade/e/B07BQK9RTZ
Check out my books! Thanks!





.jpg)
